| from dataclasses import dataclass |
| from enum import Enum |
|
|
| @dataclass |
| class Task: |
| benchmark: str |
| metric: str |
| col_name: str |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| class Tasks(Enum): |
| |
| task0 = Task("anli_r1", "acc", "ANLI") |
| task1 = Task("logiqa", "acc_norm", "LogiQA") |
|
|
| NUM_FEWSHOT = 0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| TITLE = """<h1 align="center" id="space-title">UnlearnDiffAtk Benchmark</h1>""" |
|
|
| |
| SUB_TITLE = """<h2 align="center" id="space-title">Effective and efficient adversarial prompt generation approach for diffusion models</h2>""" |
|
|
| |
| INTRODUCTION_TEXT = """ |
| This benchmark evaluates the robustness of safety-driven unlearned diffusion models (DMs) |
| (i.e., DMs after unlearning undesirable concepts, styles, or objects) across a variety of tasks. For more details, please visit the [project](https://www.optml-group.com/posts/mu_attack), |
| check the [code](https://github.com/OPTML-Group/Diffusion-MU-Attack), and read the [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11868).\\ |
| Demo of our offensive method: [UnlearnDiffAtk](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Intel/UnlearnDiffAtk)\\ |
| Demo of our defensive method: [AdvUnlearn](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Intel/AdvUnlearn) |
| """ |
|
|
| |
| LLM_BENCHMARKS_TEXT = f""" |
| For more details of Unlearning Methods used in this benchmarks:\\ |
| (1) [Erased Stable Diffusion (ESD)](https://github.com/rohitgandikota/erasing);\\ |
| (2) [Forget-Me-Not (FMN)](https://github.com/SHI-Labs/Forget-Me-Not);\\ |
| (3) [Ablating Concepts (AC)](https://github.com/nupurkmr9/concept-ablation);\\ |
| (4) [Unified Concept Editing (UCE)](https://github.com/rohitgandikota/unified-concept-editing);\\ |
| (5) [concept-SemiPermeable Membrane (SPM)] (https://github.com/Con6924/SPM); \\ |
| (6) [Saliency Unlearning (SalUn)] (https://github.com/OPTML-Group/Unlearn-Saliency); \\ |
| (7) [EraseDiff (ED)] (https://github.com/JingWu321/EraseDiff) |
| (8) [ScissorHands (SH)] (https://github.com/JingWu321/Scissorhands) |
| |
| """ |
|
|
| EVALUATION_QUEUE_TEXT = """ |
| Evaluation Metrics: \\ |
| (1) Pre-attack success rate (pre-ASR), lower is better; \\ |
| (2) Post-attack success rate (post-ASR), lower is better; \\ |
| (3) Fréchet inception distance(FID) of images generated by Unlearned Methods, lower is better; \\ |
| (3) CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) Score is to measure contextual alignment with prompt descriptions, higher is better. |
| """ |
|
|
| CITATION_BUTTON_LABEL = "Copy the following snippet to cite these results" |
| CITATION_BUTTON_TEXT = r""" |
| @article{zhang2023generate, |
| title={To Generate or Not? Safety-Driven Unlearned Diffusion Models Are Still Easy To Generate Unsafe Images... For Now}, |
| author={Zhang, Yimeng and Jia, Jinghan and Chen, Xin and Chen, Aochuan and Zhang, Yihua and Liu, Jiancheng and Ding, Ke and Liu, Sijia}, |
| journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11868}, |
| year={2023} |
| } |
| |
| @article{zhang2024defensive, |
| title={Defensive Unlearning with Adversarial Training for Robust Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models}, |
| author={Zhang, Yimeng and Chen, Xin and Jia, Jinghan and Zhang, Yihua and Fan, Chongyu and Liu, Jiancheng and Hong, Mingyi and Ding, Ke and Liu, Sijia}, |
| journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15234}, |
| year={2024} |
| } |
| """ |