Hugging Face's logo

Codeseys
/
composer-replication-framework

Reinforcement Learning
Transformers
English
post-training
distillation
agentic-coding
composer-2.5
cursor
kimi-k2
grpo
dapo
diloco
openenv
trl
verl
research
methodology
Model card Files
xet
 Community
composer-replication-framework / docs /_archive /README.md
Codeseys's picture
Codeseys
docs(wave2): archive point-in-time wave reviews + dated review bundles
f00833d
preview code
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
2.63 kB

docs/_archive — historical, point-in-time artifacts

This directory holds non-research documents that captured the state of the project at a specific moment (wave logs, dated cross-family review bundles). They are preserved verbatim for provenance and are not maintained as current truth.

What's current instead. For the live state of the framework, read docs/OVERVIEW.md, README.md, BACKLOG.md, docs/METHODOLOGY.md, docs/V1_V8_COVERAGE.md, and the accepted ADRs under docs/adrs/. Where an archived doc and a current doc disagree, the current doc wins.

Each archived file's original path still contains a one-line redirect stub so that older prose references (including those baked into immutable accepted ADRs) keep resolving.

Contents

Archived file Original path What it is Superseded by
WAVE_COMPOSER_DATAGEN_RL_2026-05-29.md docs/WAVE_COMPOSER_DATAGEN_RL_2026-05-29.md Wave log: Composer datagen + targeted-RL textual-feedback work, 2026-05-29 ADR-008, ADR-009, ADR-010, ADR-014; BACKLOG.md
DEEP_WORK_LOOP_LOG.md docs/DEEP_WORK_LOOP_LOG.md Running log of deep-work-loop sessions docs/METHODOLOGY.md; BACKLOG.md
reviews/cross-family-adr-008-009-010-2026-05-29/ docs/reviews/cross-family-adr-008-009-010-2026-05-29/ 5-family adversarial review of ADR-008/009/010 (SYNTHESIS + 4 per-model reviews) ADR-008 / ADR-012 acceptance records
reviews/final-verify-deep-work-2026-05-29/ docs/reviews/final-verify-deep-work-2026-05-29/ Phase-8 final cross-family verify (SYNTHESIS + per-model verifies) accepted ADRs; BACKLOG.md

Why archive instead of delete

These documents record how the decisions were reached — the adversarial findings, the wave-by-wave reasoning, the cross-model disagreements. That provenance is valuable for anyone auditing the framework's claims, and the accepted ADRs cite these paths by name. Deleting them would orphan those citations and erase the audit trail. Archiving keeps the trail intact while making clear they are snapshots, not the live spec.

Research-flavored point-in-time reviews (the WAVE_*_FINAL_REVIEW.md cross-model audits and the Wave-16 recon audit) live in the sibling docs/research/_archive/ instead.