ZeeshanSaud's picture
Update README.md
7388ed8 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
2.21 kB
metadata
license: gpl-3.0
tags:
  - code-analysis
  - static-analysis
  - evaluation
  - software-engineering
  - call-graph
language:
  - en
pretty_name: CodeTruth Agent V3  Module 3 Evaluation

CodeTruth Agent V3 — Module 3 Evaluation

Reproducible validation evidence for Module 3 (Repository Reasoning Engine) of CodeTruth Agent V3, frozen at tag v3.0.0-module3.

CodeTruth is a deterministic, AI-model-free static analysis tool. Module 3 adds inheritance and dispatch reasoning (C3 MRO, super()) over the Module 2 call graph, with zero fabricated edges. Every unresolved call carries a documented reason.

Contents

Inheritance resolution baselines (before/after the reasoning layer):

File What it shows
inheritance_baseline_PRE.json Inheritance resolution BEFORE C3 MRO / super() reasoning.
inheritance_baseline.json Inheritance resolution AFTER — the measured delta.

Five-domain validation reports (full analysis output per domain):

File Domain Repository
flask_web_report.json Web Flask
fluids_scientific_report.json Scientific computing fluids
click_cli_report.json CLI tooling click
poliastro_aerospace_report.json Aerospace / astrodynamics poliastro
pydicom_medical_report.json Medical imaging pydicom
pydicom_cve_2026_32711_impact.json Security-fix scoping pydicom (CVE-2026-32711)

Validation summary

Verified across five engineering domains, six report types each, three documentation paradigms. Every number reconciles; guesses: 0 throughout.

Security-fix scoping on CVE-2026-32711 (a CWE-22 path traversal in pydicom's FileSet) pointed at the exact vulnerable methods the official advisory identifies — FileInstance.path, FileSet.copy/write — while making zero fabricated security claims. The vulnerability itself is a missing data-flow containment check, which static call-graph analysis correctly does not claim to detect.

Related